Christopher Benson has just published a new review of Carl Raschke's GloboChrist at Books & Culture online, "The Messenger is the Message":
Continue reading the rest of Benson, "The Messenger is the Message" at Books & Culture online.
Just FYI for those in west Michigan, I'll be giving at talk next week at the Hope College Philosophy Department. This will be an informal lecture meant to be accessible to undergraduates. Here's the info:
Continental Philosophy of Religion: Mapping Two Postmodernisms
James K.A. Smith
Tuesday, April 14, 2009
4pm, Maas Conference Room
Abstract:
Over the past decade we have seen the emergence of "continental philosophy of religion" as a growing conversation in North American philosophy. Often associated with "postmodernism," this field considers faith and religion by drawing on the resources of French and German philosophy as articulated in figures such as Heidegger, Gadamer, Derrida, Foucault, and others. And these conversations have begun to "trickle down" into practice in, for example, conversations associated with the "emerging" church. In this talk, we'll provide a map of how postmodern sources provide a helpful lens for thinking about faith. We'll also critically consider two options or schools of thought: the "deconstructive" school of John D. Caputo and an alternative, "incarnational" model associated with Radical Orthodoxy.
"According to sources in the White House, President Barack Obama has
been uncharacteristically distant and withdrawn ever since last month's
two-hour series finale of Battlestar Galactica."
I totally feel the same way. While I still loosely follow Lost and have a guilty pleasure in Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles (which just keeps getting better), I just find myself listless and distracted without BSG.
Once Firefly was canceled (which still remains unrivaled in my opinion) I thought there would never be redemption for televised science fiction. I thought I was condemned to watching Andromeda or Stargate forever. I thought that I would eternally dwell in a universe created by Gene Roddenberry.
For me, BSG was the antithesis of Star Trek: Next Generation. All the Star Treks were really just a liberal, multi-cutlural fantasy giving us an image of what we aspired to be as a society without calling us out everything that hindered us. Not to be too crass, but it was basically cold war propaganda which then shifted into celebrating inclusion and tolerance. As someone said, Star Trek was a symbol of what we hoped to be while BSG expressed what we really are: all messed up and barely hanging on. For the most part BSG unflinchingly dealt with the tragic aspect of humanity, that we are simultaneously cylons and humans, uh, I mean sinners and saints.
I was out at dinner and I started talking with a friend whom I hadn't seen in a while. He mentioned that he'd heard I like BSG. We could have talked all night, as I could here. But I will end with this: I hope and pray that churches could function, well, but that is the wrong word, that churches could exist like BSG, describing the world as it really is and in that process opening it up to something more. Let us not as churches project a fantasy that soothes our consciences, but rather to boldly go where no few churches have gone before: the place where we deal with our actual humanity.
Trinity School for Ministry in Ambridge, PA will be hosting what looks like a fantastic conference, June 4-6, 2009, entitled "Ancient Wisdom, Anglican Futures: An Emerging Conversation." Our own Jason Clark will be one of the speakers, along with Holly Rankin Zaher, D. Stephen Long, Sam Wells, Simon Chan, and others. Here's further info from the conference website:
How do we receive and pass on the Anglican inheritance in a way that moves us "further upand further in" (a phrase from C.S. Lewis) to a deep understanding of living the Great Tradition"?
This enormous question is multi-directional. How do Anglican "insiders" welcome young
evangelicals, post-evangelicals, and emergents who are attracted to the "Great Tradition"? How do inquiring "outsiders" perceive or participate in the distinctive anamnesia (memory) of Anglican worship and mission? How can the exchange between insiders and outsiders bear fruit in Anglicanism today? How will this emerging conversation stir the mind and heart of an Anglicanism in renewal?
These questions require a "baptized imagination" (another Lewis expression) set free within a collaborative gathering that gently crosses boundaries between theology, theory and praxis. We will focus the conversation on the worship life and mission of Anglicanism:·
Be a part of our conversation at the intersection of theology and practice, worship and mission, where theologians and practitioners converge.
Discussion Leaders
Teachers
Recent Comments